As every citizen wait patiently for the appearance of Maazi Nnamdi Kanu in Abuja High Court on July 26, it is noteworthy that many prominent people have expressed their concern over the forceful repatriation of Kanu to Nigeria. Apart from Kanu' s legal team which is headed by Ifeanyi Ejiofor, a prominent Igbo Lawyer has expressed his defensive support to Kanu.
Chuks Muoma, leader of ILA and a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) has come up with intelligent questions to disprove the fact that Nnamdi Kanu jumped bail in 2017 and also to prove that Kenyan government was aware of the repatriation of Kanu to Nigeria
In his recent statement, he boldly stated that Kanu never jumped bail in 2017 rather, he fled from Nigeria in order to save himself after his house was raided by military men. He noted that if Nnamdi Kanu had wanted to jump bail, he wouldn' t have stayed in his father' s house at Umuahia before he was attacked.
Here is the question he asked as seen in a recent publication by Daily Post News.
" After he was granted bail, Kanu stayed in his father' s house at Afara- Ukwu, Umuahia, until the invasion of the house by the police, Department of State Services (DSS) and the army. He suspected that the invasion was aimed at his life and you do not expect him to do anything, " he said.
" He has the right to self- preservation, which he did to escape from danger. If he was interested in jumping bail, why didn' t he jump bail before that incident? "
He further stated that, Kenyan government cannot continue to say that the are unaware of Kanu' s arrest because, the people that held Kanu at that time passed through the boarder and no one questioned them.
His words: " There are serious cases raised in Kanu' s recent presence in or rendition to Nigeria, and I have questioned the manner of his abduction because what happened was never an arrest.
" Kenyan government is busy denying that they don' t know anything. The question is, how did the man leave your territory? Does it mean Kenya has no security within its borders? "